Should I Stay in My Job or Look for Something Else?

Deciding whether to stay in your job or leave starts with understanding what is wrong, what could realistically change and what you would be moving towards. Separate the decision to investigate other work from the later decision to accept an offer or resign.

You can feel grateful for an income and still want something different. You can also have a terrible week without needing a different career, which is why the useful question is more specific than whether you have had enough today.

Name the problem before judging the whole job

Describe a recent difficult day from beginning to end. Notice whether the worst part involved the actual work, the amount of it, a particular relationship, uncertainty about expectations or the effect of work on the rest of your life.

“I hate my job” may be an honest description of your mood, but it does not yet distinguish between these problems. Each deserves attention, and each might require a different sort of change or support.

If you like the work but cannot keep up with competing demands, begin by looking at how to discuss an unmanageable workload. If the work itself no longer interests you, changing its volume may not answer the bigger question.

Include the good parts without using them to cancel the difficult ones. A useful colleague, a reliable routine or an important benefit belongs in the picture, alongside the frustration that brought you to this article.

Put a notebook on the table and write about three ordinary working days, including one that went reasonably well. Recording what happened on paper can reveal a pattern that disappears when you remember the entire month as one long argument with yourself.

Look for a pattern rather than one decisive incident

Ask how long the concern has been present and whether it changes with workload, projects or particular people. You are looking for enough detail to understand the situation, rather than assembling a prosecution case against your employer.

A disagreement can bring an existing problem into focus, but the strength of your reaction does not establish the best response. Give yourself room to calm down before sending a resignation email or promising that you will tolerate everything indefinitely.

Consider what you have already tried and what happened afterwards. A request that was refused, a change that helped briefly and a conversation you have never attempted are different kinds of evidence.

The HSE framework for work-related stress offers useful headings for examining working conditions. It can help you identify a role or support problem that an inspiring new job title would not automatically solve.

Distinguish a repairable problem from a persistent mismatch

Some concerns could improve through an agreed change to duties, hours, communication or support. Others concern something central to the role that the organisation has little intention or ability to alter.

You might enjoy a technical role but want fewer interruptions, which suggests an experiment with how the day is organised. If you want work involving people and the role is deliberately solitary, the mismatch may be more fundamental.

Be wary of declaring every problem unchangeable before asking. Equally, repeated vague promises do not become evidence of improvement simply because you would prefer not to face a difficult decision.

Define what an acceptable improvement would look like in practice. “I need things to be better” is hard to assess, while a clearer allocation of responsibilities or a realistic deadline for resolving a recurring issue gives you something to review.

Have the conversation you may be avoiding

If it is appropriate and safe to raise the issue, explain the particular problem and the change you want to explore. Avoid beginning with a threat to leave unless you are deliberately discussing a decision you are prepared to make.

A possible opening is: “I want to discuss whether there is a workable way forward in this role, because the current arrangement is not sustainable for me.” Follow it with examples and a request, rather than a complete history of every disappointment.

Acas explains routes for raising a problem at work, including checking relevant organisational policies. Serious concerns may call for formal advice or procedures, rather than another informal attempt to persuade one person.

Notice the response as well as the words. Does someone ask useful questions, agree an action or explain a genuine limit, or does the conversation repeatedly end with you being told to cope while nothing changes?

Do not make your manager responsible for deciding your whole future

Your manager may be able to discuss responsibilities and opportunities, but cannot know what kind of life you want. Ask for information or a specific change, rather than hoping they will finally recognise an unspoken need and organise the answer.

If the issue involves progression, the Acas guidance on performance reviews can help you prepare a development discussion. Our article on asking for a promotion with evidence explores that conversation more directly.

Investigate alternatives while you still have questions

Looking does not commit you to leaving. You can read vacancies, speak to people and update your CV as a way of discovering whether the alternative in your head resembles the work actually available.

Investigate the ordinary working conditions of a potential role, including the tasks that sound less appealing. A move motivated only by escaping your current manager may lead you to overlook a new workload or timetable you would find equally difficult.

The National Careers Service advice on networking can support information-gathering conversations. Ask a modest question about somebody's work, rather than presenting every conversation as an application for immediate rescue.

You might also explore an internal move, a different project or a revised arrangement. These possibilities are worth examining without assuming that remaining with the same employer is necessarily the cautious choice or that leaving is necessarily brave.

Compare options against the same criteria

A common mistake is comparing your current job's worst day with an imagined alternative's best day. Compare ordinary weeks instead, using the same questions about work, relationships, learning, practical arrangements and room for your life outside employment.

Some information will remain uncertain until you begin a role. Be clear about what you know, what somebody has promised and what you are merely assuming because you want the opportunity to be right.

The guide to choosing between two job offers provides a more detailed comparison process. You can use similar questions before you have any offers, because they help you decide what information to seek.

• Which parts of the work would use abilities I want to develop?
• What does an ordinary week require from my time and energy?
• What support and decision-making responsibility would I have?
• Which uncertainties must I clarify before making a commitment?

Give financial and contractual questions the right kind of attention

A career decision can have consequences that a coaching exercise cannot settle. Check the actual terms involved and seek qualified guidance where notice, benefits, pensions, debt or other significant financial matters affect your options.

Do not assume that a particular emergency fund, pay cut or timetable is suitable because a stranger recommends it online. Your circumstances and responsibilities need accurate information, and the people sharing those responsibilities need a voice in the discussion.

Watch Dan: What Would You Do if You Felt Fearless

A related discussion about personal confidence, direction and the choices you make in your working life.

▶

If you are considering resignation, understand your current obligations before acting. Keep personal planning separate from your employer's confidential information, and avoid making a promise to a new organisation that you cannot reasonably keep.

It is possible to acknowledge practical limits without deciding that you are trapped forever. The next step might be gathering advice, addressing an expense or investigating training, rather than choosing between immediate resignation and another decade of silence.

Ask whether exhaustion is affecting the decision

When you are worn down, every option can look hopeless or urgently necessary. That is a reason to take your condition seriously, rather than dismissing your concerns as weakness or demanding that one career decision immediately restore your energy.

The NHS information on work-related stress discusses recognising difficulties and finding support. If distress or exhaustion is affecting daily functioning, speak to a qualified professional alongside addressing the workplace situation.

Rest does not automatically solve a badly designed role, and changing jobs does not automatically resolve a health difficulty. You may need more than one kind of action, with different people helping with different parts of the problem.

Notice whether you are able to consider a range of possibilities after some recovery time or support. More room to think can make it easier to recognise both an opportunity worth pursuing and a condition you are no longer prepared to accept.

Make staying a decision with conditions

If you stay, decide what you are choosing and what you will do differently. Remaining in a role while waiting for someone to notice your unhappiness can leave the original question untouched.

You might agree a trial change, begin a development plan or set clearer limits on availability. Be explicit about who has agreed what, and choose a reasonable point at which to examine whether the arrangement is working.

Keep the review focused on observable changes. Ask whether duties became clearer, a recurring problem was addressed or a conversation happened, rather than judging success only by whether you felt enthusiastic every morning.

If the conditions are not met, use that information. You are allowed to revise a decision without treating the earlier attempt to improve matters as wasted time or proof that you should have known everything from the beginning.

Make leaving a direction rather than a final argument

If leaving becomes the right decision for you, consider what you want the move to make possible. A clear direction can help you resist accepting the first superficially different job simply to prove that you have escaped.

You do not need every colleague to agree with your reasons. A professional explanation can be truthful and brief, without turning the departure into a referendum on whether your manager has understood you properly.

Use a personal career review to record what you want to carry forward and what you want to change. If the move involves a new field, our guide to career change at forty explores practical investigation before commitment.

Remember that mixed feelings are compatible with a sound decision. You can miss people, appreciate what the role gave you and still conclude that it no longer fits the working life you want to build.

Notice whose approval you are trying to secure

Some men cannot imagine explaining a departure to a parent who values security, while others feel ashamed about staying after repeatedly telling friends they will leave. Neither audience has to live your working week or carry all the consequences of the decision.

Listen to useful concerns without turning every opinion into an instruction. Somebody may notice a practical risk you have missed, but their fear of change or preference for status does not automatically describe what matters most to you.

Ask yourself what you would want to investigate if nobody required a convincing explanation tonight. That question does not remove your responsibilities; it helps you distinguish those responsibilities from the discomfort of being seen to make an uncertain choice.

You can explain a thoughtful decision without winning unanimous approval. “I am checking the options before committing” is enough when that is what you are doing, even if another person would prefer you to appear more certain.

Set a decision process that does not become endless postponement

Choose the information you still need, who can provide it and when you will review what you have found. Otherwise research can become another form of waiting, particularly when every answer introduces a new reason not to choose anything.

For instance, you might request a discussion about duties, speak to two people in another organisation and check a training requirement before revisiting the decision. These are examples of a bounded enquiry, not a universal timetable that every reader must follow.

At the review point, identify what changed and what remains uncertain. You may have enough information to apply elsewhere, enough evidence to try staying under different conditions, or a specific unanswered question that affects the choice.

Do not demand that either option come without loss. Leaving can mean giving up familiarity, while staying can mean giving up an imagined alternative, and acknowledging those costs often makes the decision more honest than pretending one route has none.

If you choose another review period, define what it is for. Extending the process to observe an agreed workplace change is different from extending it because you hope the uncomfortable question will quietly stop mattering.

The standard you are aiming for is a decision you can explain from your priorities and the available information. That is more realistic than requiring proof that the future will vindicate every part of it.

Ask what would make you respect the decision later

Imagine explaining your reasoning to yourself after an ordinary difficult day in whichever role you choose. Would you be able to name the information you considered, the responsibilities you recognised and the steps you took, rather than relying on the hope that no disappointment would ever occur?

That is a fairer measure than asking whether you can guarantee happiness. You can make a responsible choice and still meet problems, learn something new or eventually decide that another change is needed.

When a coaching conversation could help

Career coaching for men can help you separate your priorities from the fear, resentment or expectations surrounding the choice. The work concerns how you think, communicate and act; it does not guarantee a vacancy or make the decision on your behalf.

If you want a broader picture first, use the personal scorecard to reflect on work alongside other areas of life. Sometimes the decision becomes clearer when you stop expecting employment to meet every need for confidence, friendship or purpose.

You can read about Dan, or explore the video library before deciding whether a conversation would be useful. The related video here concerns facing a frightening choice, rather than offering a rule about when anybody should resign.

If you choose to apply for a conversation, bring the decision as it stands, including the parts you have not resolved. Being able to name the uncertainty honestly is already more useful than pretending you have settled it while privately circling the same question.

This post was published on 20 June 2026.